December 23, 2008

WFSE/AFSCME sues governor over negotiated pay raises

The Washington Federation of State Employees/AFSCME today sued Gov. Chris Gregoire for not including a funding request in her budget proposal for the pay raises negotiated between the union and her office.

The lawsuit charges the governor, her budget director, Victor Moore, and the state with breach of contract and committing an unfair labor practice for bad-faith bargaining.

The lawsuit asks Thurston County Superior Court to compel the governor to submit a request to the Legislature to fund the pay raises and other economic parts of the five contracts negotiated by the Federation. The pacts cover 30,000 General Government workers and 10,000 employees at 12 community colleges and all four-year universities and The Evergreen State College.

The Legislature would still have the final say about funding the economic parts of the contract or rejecting them. Rejection sends the contracts back to the bargaining table.

The governor in her Dec. 18 budget roll out invoked a clause in the 2002 collective bargaining law and omitted funding for the negotiated pay raises and other economics. She said her Office of Financial Management had not certified the contracts as financially feasible.

(She did include funding for the negotiated health insurance package with premium shares staying at 12 percent.)

All of the Federation contracts were ratified by members and submitted to OFM by the Oct. 1 deadline set in law.

“Both parties agreed to the terms of that agreement, with the express or implied understanding that by this agreement, the director of OFM was committing to certify that the contractual commitments were financially feasible for the state…,” the lawsuit says.

“By the late summer of 2008, the defendants were well aware of and in fact had discussions with WFSE representatives about the downturn in the economy and the worsening economic conditions. These were reasons the financial aspects of the 2009-2011 (contracts)…were the lowest ever negotiated by the parties.”

Rep. Brendan Williams, D-Olympia, joined the lawsuit to challenge the idea that the financial feasibility clause in the 2002 law prohibits the 2009 Legislature from approving legislation funding the Federation’s contracts. “One Legislature (the 2002 Legislature) cannot enact a statute that prevents a future Legislature (the 2009 Legislature) from exercising its law-making power,” the lawsuit says.

1 comment:

  1. The Governor made promises to cost of living increases while she needed our vote for her re-election. We gave her our vote...now it seems that we are no longer needed.

    One way that would have saved the State money...all of us DOT folks should have stayed home this last week with our families and loved ones - had snow ball fights, built snow men and went sledding...

    I guess we are still needed!

    ReplyDelete

Comment Policy

We appreciate our readers and thank you for adding to the discussion. The following guidelines are established to ensure respectful tone in the comments of readers so we can all enjoy the site.

• Keep comments on topic - any comment that appears to be off-topic will be edited or deleted.

• Profanity - we’re PG13 here. Moderate language is allowed, but we reserve the right to edit out anything offensive.

• Personal attacks - personal attacks on the authors or other commentators will result in an immediate ban.

• Editor’s right - While we encourage comments that challenge or offer constructed criticism, we reserve the right to edit or remove any post, and to ban a user.*

• External linking - external links are ok, if they are relevant to the original post and your comment. Simply linking to your own site will be frowned upon.

Final Words

You, and only you, are responsible for your words. Once your comment is submitted, that’s it — you’re immortalized. Think before you submit.

*WFSE members are protected under the following Communications Ethics policy:

Under the provisions of the AFSCME “Bill of Rights for Union Members” regarding communications, “Members shall suffer no impairment of freedom of speech concerning the operations of this union. Active discussion of union affairs shall be encouraged and protected within this organization.”

If you believe your comments were removed unfairly, you may protest the removal of your post to the Communications Committee. Leave your protest at Contact Us on WFSE.org