May 13, 2011

Judge blocks contracting out in Children's Administration

Thurston County Superior Court Judge Thomas McPhee late Friday afternoon granted the Federation’s a preliminary injunction blocking the DSHS Children’s Administration scheme to “short-cut” the Legislature and the law and expand contracting out of Child Welfare Services case management statewide.

McPhee said the DSHS plan is not exempt from the contracting out law and circumvents 2009 legislation that calls for a two-region pilot project to test the idea, with no final decision on statewide expansion until at least 2015.

The DSHS scheme goes “far beyond” the legislation’s mandate to convert and reduce current case management contracts, not institute new contracts.

The likelihood of transferring social worker duties and the possibility of massive layoffs is “significant and pervasive” in the request for proposals (RFP) that Children’s Administration let out to solicit the contracting out, the judge said.

McPhee said the DSHS scheme “cannot but result in a substantial decrease in the employment” of affected social workers.

To allow the contracting out to go forward would end run the thoughtful, four-year study the Legislature contemplated, the judge said.

The injunction remains until DSHS complies with the law.

The union’s full lawsuit and unfair labor practice complaint will still go forward.
This court victory freezing the contracting out comes the same day that ballots went out to Children’s Administration bargaining unit members in the vote of no confidence of Denise Revels Robinson, the DSHS assistant secretary overseeing Children’s Administration.

1 comment:

Comment Policy

We appreciate our readers and thank you for adding to the discussion. The following guidelines are established to ensure respectful tone in the comments of readers so we can all enjoy the site.

• Keep comments on topic - any comment that appears to be off-topic will be edited or deleted.

• Profanity - we’re PG13 here. Moderate language is allowed, but we reserve the right to edit out anything offensive.

• Personal attacks - personal attacks on the authors or other commentators will result in an immediate ban.

• Editor’s right - While we encourage comments that challenge or offer constructed criticism, we reserve the right to edit or remove any post, and to ban a user.*

• External linking - external links are ok, if they are relevant to the original post and your comment. Simply linking to your own site will be frowned upon.

Final Words

You, and only you, are responsible for your words. Once your comment is submitted, that’s it — you’re immortalized. Think before you submit.

*WFSE members are protected under the following Communications Ethics policy:

Under the provisions of the AFSCME “Bill of Rights for Union Members” regarding communications, “Members shall suffer no impairment of freedom of speech concerning the operations of this union. Active discussion of union affairs shall be encouraged and protected within this organization.”

If you believe your comments were removed unfairly, you may protest the removal of your post to the Communications Committee. Leave your protest at Contact Us on WFSE.org