February 14, 2009

BILL TO PRIVATIZE CHILD WELFARE SERVICES GENERATES THOUGHTFUL DISCUSSION



The bill to privatize DSHS Child Welfare Services got a polite hearing but firm Federation opposition in a hearing Friday in the Senate Human Services and Corrections Committee.

“Legislation compelling that all Child Welfare Services be privatized is like throwing the baby out with the bathwater,” said Ursula Petters, a social worker 4 in Bremerton and member of Local 1181.

“We support performance-based service delivery, but we can do that with reform within the agency in concert with our community-based partners.”

The sponsor of SB 5943, Sen. Jim Hargrove of the 24th District, said he introduced the measure because, he said, there’s little improvement despite an additional 821 employees over the past 10 years.

“The current system…is dysfunctional,” Hargrove said. “Our trends are going in the wrong direction.”

The problem is insufficient resources everywhere, said Jeanine Livingston, the Federation’s contracting compliance director.

“The underlying theme is that both the public and private sectors are experiencing caseworker burnout, turnover and inadequate recruiting of experienced social workers,” Livingston said.

SB 5943 ignores the experience in other states and several recent studies and task forces in this state.

“This bill fundamentally betrays the very professionals who directly serve some of the most vulnerable citizens of this state by putting them out of work, without benefits or retirement, and dissolves the experience and institutional knowledge of this state’s children and families at a time when such resources are precious and rare,” she said.

A House bill taking a more thoughtful approach gets a hearing next week in the House Early Learning and Children’s Services Committee.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comment Policy

We appreciate our readers and thank you for adding to the discussion. The following guidelines are established to ensure respectful tone in the comments of readers so we can all enjoy the site.

• Keep comments on topic - any comment that appears to be off-topic will be edited or deleted.

• Profanity - we’re PG13 here. Moderate language is allowed, but we reserve the right to edit out anything offensive.

• Personal attacks - personal attacks on the authors or other commentators will result in an immediate ban.

• Editor’s right - While we encourage comments that challenge or offer constructed criticism, we reserve the right to edit or remove any post, and to ban a user.*

• External linking - external links are ok, if they are relevant to the original post and your comment. Simply linking to your own site will be frowned upon.

Final Words

You, and only you, are responsible for your words. Once your comment is submitted, that’s it — you’re immortalized. Think before you submit.

*WFSE members are protected under the following Communications Ethics policy:

Under the provisions of the AFSCME “Bill of Rights for Union Members” regarding communications, “Members shall suffer no impairment of freedom of speech concerning the operations of this union. Active discussion of union affairs shall be encouraged and protected within this organization.”

If you believe your comments were removed unfairly, you may protest the removal of your post to the Communications Committee. Leave your protest at Contact Us on WFSE.org