January 27, 2010
Furlough bill treats Washington's state employees differently than comparable states
The state employee furlough bill may be on a fast track for passage, but it was exposed Tuesday as making state employees the sacrificial lamb in the budget debate.
And the furlough plan is unprecedented when compared to sacrifices inflicted on state employees in 16 other comparable states, Federation Executive Director Greg Devereux told the House Ways and Means Committee Tuesday (Jan. 26).
Devereux told the budget writers that SSB 6503 “is predicated on cuts and furloughs first, then votes on a broad revenue proposal. We do not see that broad revenue proposal on the horizon and it feels like state services and state workers are going to bear the brunt of this recession.”
“SSB 6503 contemplates more extensive furloughs than 16 other states that are comparable to ours,” he said. “None of those other states have taken health care cuts and furloughs. We would be the only state among them.”
If furloughs are implemented, they should be focused on higher-paid employees, like those in the Washington Management Service and the exempt service, he said.
State employees have sacrificed much already, yet billions in tax breaks remain untouched, Devereux said.
“Since 2000, this Legislature has passed 154 tax exemptions -- 27 percent of the total tax exemptions in this state -- totaling $3 billion. I would imagine some of those are excellent, they create jobs but some of them probably could be furloughed or suspended temporarily to bridge us through this period.
“In the end, the root cause of this Great Recession really is middle class wage stagnation. Certain sectors of our economy got fabulously rich while the rest of us were treading water.
“Laying off state workers, furloughing state workers, cutting the health care benefits of state workers, will only lead to further stagnation and economic harm to our communities. The answer is shared sacrifice by spreading the revenue needs for our citizens across as many people as possible rather than continuous cuts to specific groups.”
The committee is expected to vote on SSB 6503 today. So, call 1-800-562-6000 and urge your two House members to vote NO! on SSB 6503. Its unintended consequences will cost more, not less.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comment Policy
We appreciate our readers and thank you for adding to the discussion. The following guidelines are established to ensure respectful tone in the comments of readers so we can all enjoy the site.
• Keep comments on topic - any comment that appears to be off-topic will be edited or deleted.
• Profanity - we’re PG13 here. Moderate language is allowed, but we reserve the right to edit out anything offensive.
• Personal attacks - personal attacks on the authors or other commentators will result in an immediate ban.
• Editor’s right - While we encourage comments that challenge or offer constructed criticism, we reserve the right to edit or remove any post, and to ban a user.*
• External linking - external links are ok, if they are relevant to the original post and your comment. Simply linking to your own site will be frowned upon.
Final Words
You, and only you, are responsible for your words. Once your comment is submitted, that’s it — you’re immortalized. Think before you submit.
*WFSE members are protected under the following Communications Ethics policy:
Under the provisions of the AFSCME “Bill of Rights for Union Members” regarding communications, “Members shall suffer no impairment of freedom of speech concerning the operations of this union. Active discussion of union affairs shall be encouraged and protected within this organization.”
If you believe your comments were removed unfairly, you may protest the removal of your post to the Communications Committee. Leave your protest at Contact Us on WFSE.org