Committee Chair Rep. Steve Conway, D-29th Dist., said collective bargaining “is a problem solver” in trying to fix a broken system.
HB 3062 now goes to the House Ways and Means Committee, where it has until Feb. 9 to pass.
Meanwhile, the Senate version, SB 6726, came before the Senate Labor, Commerce and Consumer Protection Committee.
Over the years, the interpreter program run by DSHS has gotten bogged down with a system of middlemen who siphon off mostly federal funding before it even reaches the interpreters doing the actual translation services for non-English speaking Medicaid clients visiting their doctors.
That’s the message the Federation’s Dennis Eagle delivered the committee.
SB 6726 not only extends collective bargaining rights to the interpreters, but reforms the delivery of services by ending the brokerage system of middlemen, he said.
The program has been targeted by the governor for elimination to save $4 million while forfeiting $12 million in federal funds.
“The best chance we think to save this program is if we can achieve some savings…,” Eagle said.
“We’re losing more money to middlemen than we’re actually spending on interpreters.”
Interpreter Cynthia Roat said technology exists that would allow online booking of interpreters, making the archaic system of brokers unnecessary. More money would go to interpreters, which would attract more interpreters and still save the state money, she said.
“I think we can do this more cheaply, we can do it more efficiently and we can do it in a simpler way,” Roat said.
The bill is about solutions, said interpreter Narscisa Hodges.
Right now, 40 percent of the funding is lost on overhead to the middlemen brokers, she said.
“Forty percent overhead is wrong,” Hodges said. “We have ideas. Pass this bill. Let us form a workgroup to find the answers. We must cut or limit middlemen and overhead costs. We must restore professional pay and fairness to improve quality. This will save money for the state.”
SB 6726 has until Friday to clear the Senate committee.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comment Policy
We appreciate our readers and thank you for adding to the discussion. The following guidelines are established to ensure respectful tone in the comments of readers so we can all enjoy the site.
• Keep comments on topic - any comment that appears to be off-topic will be edited or deleted.
• Profanity - we’re PG13 here. Moderate language is allowed, but we reserve the right to edit out anything offensive.
• Personal attacks - personal attacks on the authors or other commentators will result in an immediate ban.
• Editor’s right - While we encourage comments that challenge or offer constructed criticism, we reserve the right to edit or remove any post, and to ban a user.*
• External linking - external links are ok, if they are relevant to the original post and your comment. Simply linking to your own site will be frowned upon.
Final Words
You, and only you, are responsible for your words. Once your comment is submitted, that’s it — you’re immortalized. Think before you submit.
*WFSE members are protected under the following Communications Ethics policy:
Under the provisions of the AFSCME “Bill of Rights for Union Members” regarding communications, “Members shall suffer no impairment of freedom of speech concerning the operations of this union. Active discussion of union affairs shall be encouraged and protected within this organization.”
If you believe your comments were removed unfairly, you may protest the removal of your post to the Communications Committee. Leave your protest at Contact Us on WFSE.org