This time it’s on the version that passed the Senate, but the Federation-initiated interpreters collective bargaining bill got another good reception back in the House.
Rep. Alex Wood of the 3rd District even gave the AFSCME Interpreters United activists an over-the-head, double thumbs up before they testified Friday in the House Commerce and Labor Committee.
ESSB 6726 would give the interpreters collective bargaining rights and convene a work group to look at other reforms, including possibly ending the middleman system of brokers that siphons off millions of dollars before it ever reaches the DSHS interpreters.
“Under this state policy, interpreters’ wages have been going down, not just in the short-term because of a crisis, but systematically over the years,” the Federation’s Dennis Eagle told the committee. “Wages are going down under the tutelage of the state in the DSHS system.
“As independent contractors, the interpreters are powerless to do anything about this. They can’t complain, or they just don’t get hired anymore.
“So they’re voting with their feet, leaving the field, the pool of qualified interpreters for medically needy people is diminishing, the department’s forced to lower standards in order to get enough people into the pool….and it’s having an adverse impact on the 160,000 users of this service every year.
“And that’s why the collective bargaining piece is so important to the interpreters. Sure, their wages need to improve, there’s more to it than that. It’s about having a voice, about being part of a team, and banding together to solve problems and promote their industry.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comment Policy
We appreciate our readers and thank you for adding to the discussion. The following guidelines are established to ensure respectful tone in the comments of readers so we can all enjoy the site.
• Keep comments on topic - any comment that appears to be off-topic will be edited or deleted.
• Profanity - we’re PG13 here. Moderate language is allowed, but we reserve the right to edit out anything offensive.
• Personal attacks - personal attacks on the authors or other commentators will result in an immediate ban.
• Editor’s right - While we encourage comments that challenge or offer constructed criticism, we reserve the right to edit or remove any post, and to ban a user.*
• External linking - external links are ok, if they are relevant to the original post and your comment. Simply linking to your own site will be frowned upon.
Final Words
You, and only you, are responsible for your words. Once your comment is submitted, that’s it — you’re immortalized. Think before you submit.
*WFSE members are protected under the following Communications Ethics policy:
Under the provisions of the AFSCME “Bill of Rights for Union Members” regarding communications, “Members shall suffer no impairment of freedom of speech concerning the operations of this union. Active discussion of union affairs shall be encouraged and protected within this organization.”
If you believe your comments were removed unfairly, you may protest the removal of your post to the Communications Committee. Leave your protest at Contact Us on WFSE.org