This is a special update of the Federation Hotline at about midnight, 7/8/10
The governor’s office and state negotiators got an earful on furloughs Wednesday.
Nearly 2,000 “No FurloUGHs” petitions were delivered one-by-one and spread across the governor’s office’s newly refinished conference room table. The special furlough bargaining team, joined by the Community College Coalition Bargaining Team, gave the individually signed petitions to the governor’s chief of staff, Jay Manning, during the Wednesday lunch break. They then pelted Manning with questions about the furlough farce that will actually cost $94 million in lost federal matching funds, run up huge overtime costs (just as in Oregon) and make a political statement rather than saving any money.
Meanwhile, the special furlough bargaining team wrapped up its scheduled two days of bargaining on the impacts of the furloughs set to start Monday, July 12. The union demanded the negotiations to effectively mitigate the impact of furloughs on thousands of members—if furloughs could not be blocked quickly.
Wednesday’s talks stretched to 15 hours. There was some movement on such issues as how to deal with those on alternative work schedules who stand to lose more than eight hours of pay on a furlough day.
But both sides could not reach agreement so negotiations will continue on a comprehensive agreement. That will come July 15, after the first furlough day. Management made it clear it was too late for any agreement to take effect July 12. That harsh reality arose July 2 after a Thurston County Superior Court judge rejected the union’s motion for an injunction, and instead sent the Federation legal challenge to a full trial. No date has been set yet.
So the focus now is on affecting the next scheduled furlough day, Aug. 6, and the others that come after that.
The union did not concede that furloughs are OK, even as the July 12 furloughs will go forward. The union’s bargaining, lawsuit, grievance and unfair labor practice complaint may take time to bring justice. But as the judge suggested last week, the state might be forced to reimburse affected employees for any lost wages caused by furloughs if down the line the union prevails in its many efforts.
But tensions ran high Wednesday as an early management proposal struck the union team as an insult to affected members.
So, the negotiations on an overarching memorandum of understanding to mitigate furloughs continue July 15.
The more immediate talks to correct the list that improperly targets for temporary layoffs some employees exempted from furloughs in Health, Corrections and Social and Health Services continue today with special subcommittees still being formed late Wednesday night. The outcome of those negotiations would take effect on the July 12 furlough day.
Job actions and all the other legal and administrative actions continue as well.
Bargaining shifts gears Thursday and Friday as the General Government Bargaining Team returns to the table.
That’s it for now.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comment Policy
We appreciate our readers and thank you for adding to the discussion. The following guidelines are established to ensure respectful tone in the comments of readers so we can all enjoy the site.
• Keep comments on topic - any comment that appears to be off-topic will be edited or deleted.
• Profanity - we’re PG13 here. Moderate language is allowed, but we reserve the right to edit out anything offensive.
• Personal attacks - personal attacks on the authors or other commentators will result in an immediate ban.
• Editor’s right - While we encourage comments that challenge or offer constructed criticism, we reserve the right to edit or remove any post, and to ban a user.*
• External linking - external links are ok, if they are relevant to the original post and your comment. Simply linking to your own site will be frowned upon.
Final Words
You, and only you, are responsible for your words. Once your comment is submitted, that’s it — you’re immortalized. Think before you submit.
*WFSE members are protected under the following Communications Ethics policy:
Under the provisions of the AFSCME “Bill of Rights for Union Members” regarding communications, “Members shall suffer no impairment of freedom of speech concerning the operations of this union. Active discussion of union affairs shall be encouraged and protected within this organization.”
If you believe your comments were removed unfairly, you may protest the removal of your post to the Communications Committee. Leave your protest at Contact Us on WFSE.org