The new department would supposedly consolidate “back office” duties in state government.
DIS would actually be parceled out to three agencies: the new Enterprise Services agency, a proposed charter agency on consolidated technical services and what remains of the Office of Financial Management.
The proposal came before the House General Government Appropriations Committee. The governor’s representatives said a bill would be introduced by Monday.
Jeff Paulsen, a Local 443 activist in the Department of Information Services and a member of the union’s task force on information technology shared services, said his agency has been a good provider of cost-effective services to other agencies.
“So we’re concerned about the governor’s statement that the new agency will emphasize competition to get the best price for services,” Paulsen said. “To us that could mean an increased rush to contract out state services best done in-house.”
He urged lawmakers to proceed with caution.
Federation Lobbyist Alia Griffing said employees represented by the Federation transferred in any consolidation must retain their collective bargaining rights.
And there should be no rush to privatization because of provisions in the contract and law on managed competition. That’s the system allowing state employees to keep work targeted for contracting out in-house if they can show they can do it cheaper, faster and more efficiently.
ALSO:
- House Bill 1209 introduced Monday aims to help Community Corrections officers. It would allow CCOs greater flexibility in determining sanctions for supervision violations and in searches of offenders. The bill has been referred to the House Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Committee.
- And another proposed constitutional amendment has been introduced to extend pay cuts to state elected officials. HJR 4204 has been referred to the House State Government and Tribal Affairs Committee.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comment Policy
We appreciate our readers and thank you for adding to the discussion. The following guidelines are established to ensure respectful tone in the comments of readers so we can all enjoy the site.
• Keep comments on topic - any comment that appears to be off-topic will be edited or deleted.
• Profanity - we’re PG13 here. Moderate language is allowed, but we reserve the right to edit out anything offensive.
• Personal attacks - personal attacks on the authors or other commentators will result in an immediate ban.
• Editor’s right - While we encourage comments that challenge or offer constructed criticism, we reserve the right to edit or remove any post, and to ban a user.*
• External linking - external links are ok, if they are relevant to the original post and your comment. Simply linking to your own site will be frowned upon.
Final Words
You, and only you, are responsible for your words. Once your comment is submitted, that’s it — you’re immortalized. Think before you submit.
*WFSE members are protected under the following Communications Ethics policy:
Under the provisions of the AFSCME “Bill of Rights for Union Members” regarding communications, “Members shall suffer no impairment of freedom of speech concerning the operations of this union. Active discussion of union affairs shall be encouraged and protected within this organization.”
If you believe your comments were removed unfairly, you may protest the removal of your post to the Communications Committee. Leave your protest at Contact Us on WFSE.org