January 13, 2011

Maple Lane closure would jeopardize residents, Local 1926 member testifies

Local 1926 member Craig Larsen told a House committee Thursday that the ramped up closure of Maple Lane School would jeopardize many of the youthful offenders treated in the south Thurston County juvenile rehabilitation campus.

The governor’s plan to close Maple Lane would save only about $18 million, while there’s a plan to spend $15 million to $20 million to expand Green Hill School in Chehalis to take some of the Maple Lane residents.

But the two institutions are not interchangeable, he told the House Health and Human Services Appropriations Committee.

“You can’t house our kids at Green Hill,” Larsen said. “They would become victims there.”

Two state studies in 2006 and 2009 argued against closure of Maple Lane.

“I think if you go back and re-study those studies you can come to a reasonable conclusion it does not make sense to shut us down fiscally or for these kids,” Larsen said. “We still have two buildings out there that were not paid for yet.”

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comment Policy

We appreciate our readers and thank you for adding to the discussion. The following guidelines are established to ensure respectful tone in the comments of readers so we can all enjoy the site.

• Keep comments on topic - any comment that appears to be off-topic will be edited or deleted.

• Profanity - we’re PG13 here. Moderate language is allowed, but we reserve the right to edit out anything offensive.

• Personal attacks - personal attacks on the authors or other commentators will result in an immediate ban.

• Editor’s right - While we encourage comments that challenge or offer constructed criticism, we reserve the right to edit or remove any post, and to ban a user.*

• External linking - external links are ok, if they are relevant to the original post and your comment. Simply linking to your own site will be frowned upon.

Final Words

You, and only you, are responsible for your words. Once your comment is submitted, that’s it — you’re immortalized. Think before you submit.

*WFSE members are protected under the following Communications Ethics policy:

Under the provisions of the AFSCME “Bill of Rights for Union Members” regarding communications, “Members shall suffer no impairment of freedom of speech concerning the operations of this union. Active discussion of union affairs shall be encouraged and protected within this organization.”

If you believe your comments were removed unfairly, you may protest the removal of your post to the Communications Committee. Leave your protest at Contact Us on WFSE.org