March 22, 2011

Bill limiting liability for Community Corrections, DSHS workers acting in good faith picks up some powerful supporters

The bill to limit liability for Community Corrections and DSHS social workers acting in good faith picked up the support of the state Attorney General’s office and the Department of Corrections Monday (March 21) in a hearing before the House Judiciary Committee.

ESSB 5605 had earlier passed the Senate 40-9.

A trio of Federation speakers applauded the high-level support.

“As a CCO, I do believe in accountability,” Local 308 member Ton Johnson told the committee. “But the problem from my perspective is we don’t have a good balance. Subsequently, the liability becomes the determinant consideration on operational decisions.”

Mike Wiseman, a Local 443 member of the Department of Health, who serves on a special Federation committee on liability reform issues, said ESSB 5605 supports the values of “accountability and improved services.”

The bill “doesn’t reduce the duties owed but it does set the criteria under which the government will pay for certain errors and omissions,” Wiseman said. “We don’t see any diminishing of the dedication or motivation of DSHS caseworkers. And we would suggest that that should not be read into the bill.”

“Too often bad outcomes are caused by non-state actors,” said another member of that task force, Steve Segal, a Local 443 member in DSHS. 

“This legislation will not cause bad outcomes. State employees who work these cases are conscientious, caring, hard-working. This legislation won’t change those attributes.”

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comment Policy

We appreciate our readers and thank you for adding to the discussion. The following guidelines are established to ensure respectful tone in the comments of readers so we can all enjoy the site.

• Keep comments on topic - any comment that appears to be off-topic will be edited or deleted.

• Profanity - we’re PG13 here. Moderate language is allowed, but we reserve the right to edit out anything offensive.

• Personal attacks - personal attacks on the authors or other commentators will result in an immediate ban.

• Editor’s right - While we encourage comments that challenge or offer constructed criticism, we reserve the right to edit or remove any post, and to ban a user.*

• External linking - external links are ok, if they are relevant to the original post and your comment. Simply linking to your own site will be frowned upon.

Final Words

You, and only you, are responsible for your words. Once your comment is submitted, that’s it — you’re immortalized. Think before you submit.

*WFSE members are protected under the following Communications Ethics policy:

Under the provisions of the AFSCME “Bill of Rights for Union Members” regarding communications, “Members shall suffer no impairment of freedom of speech concerning the operations of this union. Active discussion of union affairs shall be encouraged and protected within this organization.”

If you believe your comments were removed unfairly, you may protest the removal of your post to the Communications Committee. Leave your protest at Contact Us on WFSE.org