May 13, 2011

Calls needed to oppose pair of bad corrections bills

We thank you for all the calls you’ve made to oppose SB 5891, the corrections bill that would release dangerous prisoners early and eliminate community custody for high-risk offenders.

But it’s apparent SB 5891 is going hand-in-hand with another bad bill, HB 2066, which would cut tolling in Community Corrections. Tolling is a technical term, but the issue is whether the clock stops when an offender violates his or her terms of community custody and goes back to jail. Right now, if they screw up, the clock stops and their community custody obligation resumes once they’re out of jail. Under HB 2066, the clock would keep ticking while they were back in jail – so a dangerous offender could purposely try to run out the clock in a comfortable jail cell and never get all the treatment and supervision they need. It’s a recipe for tragedy. HB 2066 has not even had a hearing.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comment Policy

We appreciate our readers and thank you for adding to the discussion. The following guidelines are established to ensure respectful tone in the comments of readers so we can all enjoy the site.

• Keep comments on topic - any comment that appears to be off-topic will be edited or deleted.

• Profanity - we’re PG13 here. Moderate language is allowed, but we reserve the right to edit out anything offensive.

• Personal attacks - personal attacks on the authors or other commentators will result in an immediate ban.

• Editor’s right - While we encourage comments that challenge or offer constructed criticism, we reserve the right to edit or remove any post, and to ban a user.*

• External linking - external links are ok, if they are relevant to the original post and your comment. Simply linking to your own site will be frowned upon.

Final Words

You, and only you, are responsible for your words. Once your comment is submitted, that’s it — you’re immortalized. Think before you submit.

*WFSE members are protected under the following Communications Ethics policy:

Under the provisions of the AFSCME “Bill of Rights for Union Members” regarding communications, “Members shall suffer no impairment of freedom of speech concerning the operations of this union. Active discussion of union affairs shall be encouraged and protected within this organization.”

If you believe your comments were removed unfairly, you may protest the removal of your post to the Communications Committee. Leave your protest at Contact Us on WFSE.org